Pentagon official blesses Europe’s push to spend defense money at home
The Pentagon has announced a significant policy shift regarding European defense procurement, with Under Secretary Elbridge Colby stating the U.S. will be 'pragmatic' about European allies buying defense equipment domestically rather than from American contractors. This represents a reversal of 30 y
Cabrillo Club
Editorial Team · February 16, 2026

Also in this intelligence package
Segment Impact Analysis: Pentagon Europe Defense Procurement Policy Shift
Executive Summary
The Pentagon's endorsement of European domestic defense procurement represents a seismic shift in transatlantic defense trade policy with profound implications across the U.S. defense industrial base. This policy reversal, articulated by Under Secretary Elbridge Colby, effectively legitimizes European protectionism in defense markets that have generated approximately $30-40 billion annually in U.S. arms exports (35% of total U.S. defense exports). The immediate impact will be most severe for prime contractors heavily dependent on Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) to European NATO allies, particularly in complete weapons systems, aircraft, and major platforms where European alternatives exist or are under development.
However, this policy shift creates a bifurcated market opportunity structure. While prime contractors face market access restrictions for end-items, subsystem suppliers, critical technology providers, and specialized component manufacturers may experience increased demand as European primes accelerate domestic production and seek U.S. technology partnerships to maintain interoperability and capability advantages. The policy effectively forces a strategic recalibration from "selling to Europe" to "enabling European production" through licensing, joint ventures, and technology transfer arrangements—albeit within ITAR and EAR constraints.
The timeline for impact is compressed. European defense budgets are expanding rapidly in response to geopolitical pressures, with Germany alone committing €100 billion in additional defense spending. Contractors must act within the next 6-12 months to reposition their European strategies, as procurement decisions currently in planning phases will reflect this new policy reality. Those who successfully pivot from direct sales to technology partnerships, co-production arrangements, and critical subsystem supply will capture disproportionate value in the restructured market.
Impact Matrix
Defense Exports - Complete Weapons Systems & Platforms
- Risk Level: Critical
- Opportunity: This segment faces existential threat to traditional business models but can pivot to licensed production, technology transfer agreements, and sustainment contracts. European nations still require U.S. technology for interoperability with NATO systems and access to cutting-edge capabilities. The opportunity lies in becoming the "Intel Inside" of European defense production—providing critical subsystems, software, sensors, and technology licenses that European primes must integrate to achieve required capabilities.
- Timeline: Immediate (0-6 months) for pipeline deals; 6-18 months for strategic repositioning
- Action Required:
1. Conduct portfolio analysis to identify which platforms face direct European competition vs. those with unique capabilities
2. Initiate discussions with European primes on co-production and licensed manufacturing arrangements
3. Restructure pricing models from platform sales to technology licensing + sustainment revenue streams
4. Engage State Department and DSCA to understand new FMS approval criteria under this policy
5. Identify critical subsystems and technologies that can be carved out for continued direct export even as platforms are produced locally
- Competitive Edge: Sophisticated contractors will immediately establish "European Industrial Participation Offices" that proactively offer technology packages to European primes before RFPs are issued. They'll structure deals where U.S. companies retain IP ownership but license production rights with per-unit royalties, maintain exclusive sustainment contracts, and require U.S.-sourced critical components (propulsion, avionics, sensors) that European manufacturers cannot replicate. The winning strategy is to make European "domestic" production dependent on continued U.S. technology supply, creating annuity revenue streams that may exceed original platform sales over lifecycle.
Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing - Subsystems & Components
- Risk Level: Medium
- Opportunity: This segment emerges as a primary beneficiary. As European primes ramp domestic production, they'll face critical capability gaps in specialized subsystems: precision guidance systems, advanced sensors, electronic warfare suites, propulsion components, and mission computers. European supply chains lack depth in these areas, and interoperability requirements mandate U.S.-compatible systems. The opportunity is to become the indispensable supplier to European production lines, with long-term supply agreements that provide more stable revenue than episodic platform sales.
- Timeline: 6-18 months as European production programs transition from planning to execution
- Action Required:
1. Map European prime contractors' supply chain gaps by platform type
2. Obtain ITAR authorizations for component-level exports to European defense manufacturers
3. Establish European distribution partnerships or local subsidiaries to reduce friction in supply chain
4. Develop "NATO-qualified" component certifications that become de facto requirements
5. Create bundled subsystem packages that solve integration challenges for European primes
- Competitive Edge: Leading contractors will embed engineers directly with European primes during their design phases, ensuring U.S. components are designed-in from the start rather than competing for retrofit opportunities. They'll establish "qualified supplier" status with multiple European primes simultaneously, creating switching costs. The sophisticated play is to offer "system integration support" packages where U.S. suppliers help European primes integrate complex subsystems, making the European manufacturer dependent on U.S. technical expertise even after production begins. Additionally, they'll structure multi-year supply agreements with price escalation clauses tied to European defense budget growth, capturing upside from increased European spending.
Defense Industrial Base - Engineering & Technical Services
- Risk Level: Low to Medium
- Opportunity: European defense manufacturers will require massive technical assistance to scale production, achieve U.S. interoperability standards, and integrate advanced technologies. This creates unprecedented demand for engineering services, systems integration support, test and evaluation expertise, cybersecurity certification, and program management assistance. U.S. contractors with deep technical expertise can provide "production enablement" services that generate high-margin revenue without triggering protectionist concerns since services support European jobs.
- Timeline: 12-24 months as European production programs mature and encounter technical challenges
- Action Required:
1. Develop "European Production Support" service offerings specifically designed for technology transfer scenarios
2. Recruit or partner with European engineering firms to provide local presence with U.S. expertise
3. Create training programs for European engineers on U.S. systems, standards, and integration protocols
4. Establish cybersecurity and ITAR compliance consulting practices for European defense manufacturers
How ready are you for CMMC?
Take our free readiness assessment. 10 questions, instant results, no email required until you want your report.
Check Your CMMC ReadinessCabrillo Club
Editorial Team
Cabrillo Club helps government contractors win more contracts with AI-powered proposal automation and compliance solutions.