CMMC Ready — CMMC Level 2
78% NIST 800-171 coverage. 2 control gaps identified.
CMMC Status
CMMC Ready
Target Level
Level 2
NIST Coverage
78%
Druva Government
by Druva
Overview
Druva Government by Druva is a backup & recovery solution with FedRAMP authorization targeting CMMC Level 2 compliance. It provides 78% coverage of NIST 800-171 controls for defense contractors handling CUI.
What This Means for Defense Contractors
Druva Government meets the architectural requirements for CMMC Level 2. However, CMMC compliance depends on your entire system boundary — not just individual tools. There are 2 NIST 800-171 control gaps that need remediation before assessment. Defense contractors using Druva Government should verify that their System Security Plan (SSP) documents how this tool fits within their authorization boundary.
NIST 800-171 Coverage
Control Gaps
Using Druva Government without addressing these NIST 800-171 controls may result in findings during a CMMC assessment:
Strengths
Using Druva Government in a CMMC Environment
For defense contractors already using Druva Government, the path to CMMC compliance involves documenting the tool in your System Security Plan (SSP), ensuring proper access controls are configured, and validating that Druva Government's security controls align with your authorization boundary. With 78% NIST 800-171 coverage, Druva Government provides a strong compliance foundation, though the 2 remaining control gaps will need compensating controls or supplementary tools.
CMMC-Ready Backup & Recovery Alternatives
CMMC Compliance Analysis for Druva Government
Druva Government demonstrates strong CMMC Level 2 readiness with its FedRAMP High authorization and dedicated government cloud infrastructure. For defense contractors handling CUI, Druva Government excels in backup workflows by providing automated encryption of CUI data at rest and in transit, maintaining data sovereignty within CONUS boundaries, and implementing granular access controls that align with principle of least privilege requirements. The platform particularly excels in NIST 800-171 control families 3.1 (Access Control), 3.3 (Audit and Accountability), and 3.13 (System and Communications Protection) through its RBAC implementation, comprehensive audit logging, and encryption capabilities. However, gaps in controls 3.5.7 (privileged account management) and 3.8.1 (media protection) require attention. During a C3PAO Level 2 assessment, assessors will scrutinize Druva Government's boundary placement, data flow documentation, and compensating controls for the identified gaps. The solution can exist within the CMMC authorization boundary as it processes and stores CUI, making it a system component requiring full compliance assessment. Compared to competitors like Veeam or Commvault, Druva Government's government-specific design and FedRAMP authorization provide significant advantages for CMMC compliance. The dedicated government data centers and STIG-hardened configurations reduce implementation overhead compared to commercial backup solutions that require extensive hardening. However, the identified control gaps may necessitate additional third-party tools or compensating controls that competitors might address natively, potentially increasing total cost of ownership for complete CMMC compliance.
Configuration Guide
To optimize Druva Government for CMMC Level 2 assessment readiness, implement the following configuration changes: Configure privileged access management (PAM) integration or implement compensating controls for 3.5.7 through enhanced logging and approval workflows for privileged backup operations. Address 3.8.1 gaps by documenting media handling procedures for backup storage and implementing additional access controls for backup media management. Enable all available audit logging features and configure log forwarding to a SIEM system for centralized monitoring. Implement multi-factor authentication for all administrative accounts and configure role-based access controls aligned with organizational need-to-know principles. Document compensating controls in the System Security Plan (SSP) including procedural controls for privileged account monitoring and media protection workflows. Establish continuous monitoring procedures including monthly access reviews, quarterly configuration assessments, and annual penetration testing of backup infrastructure. The remediation timeline should span 8-12 weeks: weeks 1-4 for configuration changes and integration setup, weeks 5-8 for testing and validation, and weeks 9-12 for documentation updates and staff training. Prepare evidence packages including configuration screenshots, audit logs demonstrating proper access controls, documentation of encryption implementations, and proof of FedRAMP authorization maintenance. Maintain vendor attestations and ensure continuous compliance through automated configuration monitoring and regular third-party assessments.
Configuration Checklist
- 1ISSO must document Druva Government within the CMMC authorization boundary and update system inventory in SSP Section 2
- 2Sysadmin should configure multi-factor authentication for all Druva Government administrative accounts per NIST 800-171 control 3.5.3
- 3ISSO must implement compensating controls for 3.5.7 privileged account management through enhanced monitoring and approval workflows
- 4Sysadmin should integrate Druva Government audit logs with organizational SIEM system for centralized monitoring per control 3.3.1
- 5ISSO must develop media protection procedures addressing control 3.8.1 gaps and document in SSP Section 8
- 6Contracts team should verify current FedRAMP authorization status and establish ongoing monitoring requirements
- 7Sysadmin should configure role-based access controls aligned with organizational access control policy per control 3.1.1
- 8ISSO must create POA&M entries for identified control gaps with specific remediation timelines and milestones
- 9C3PAO should review Druva Government configuration during boundary scoping and data flow analysis phases
- 10ISSO should establish quarterly compliance reviews and annual third-party assessments for continuous monitoring
Estimated Compliance Cost
Initial remediation and configuration costs range from $25,000-$45,000, including PAM integration, SIEM connectivity, and professional services for gap closure. This includes 2-3 weeks of specialized consulting at $3,000-$4,000 per week for CMMC-specific configuration optimization. Annual ongoing compliance costs range from $15,000-$25,000, covering continuous monitoring tools, quarterly vulnerability assessments, and annual third-party compliance validation. The Druva Government subscription itself typically costs 15-20% more than standard commercial backup solutions but provides significant value through reduced compliance overhead. Additional costs include staff training ($5,000-$8,000 initially), documentation updates ($3,000-$5,000 annually), and potential compensating control implementations ($10,000-$20,000). Total 3-year compliance lifecycle cost ranges from $85,000-$145,000, which is competitive compared to achieving similar compliance with commercial backup solutions requiring extensive hardening and continuous monitoring.
Compliance Cross-References
Druva Government's FedRAMP High authorization directly satisfies DFARS 252.204-7012 requirements for adequate security when processing CUI in cloud environments, providing contractors with pre-approved cloud service provider status. The solution addresses DFARS 252.204-7021 requirements through its comprehensive audit capabilities and incident response procedures. For NIST 800-171 control families, Druva Government provides strong coverage across 3.1 (Access Control), 3.3 (Audit), 3.4 (Configuration Management), and 3.13 (System Protection), but requires attention for 3.5.7 (Identity Management) and 3.8.1 (Media Protection). Within CMMC Level 2 assessment domains, the platform excels in Access Control (AC), Audit and Accountability (AU), and System and Communications Protection (SC) domains while requiring compensating controls in Identification and Authentication (IA) and Media Protection (MP) domains. The FedRAMP authorization provides continuous monitoring and regular assessment requirements that align with CMMC's emphasis on institutionalized cybersecurity practices. Contractors using Druva Government benefit from leveraging existing FedRAMP compliance artifacts and can reference the FedRAMP Package as supporting evidence during CMMC assessments, reducing documentation burden and assessment scope complexity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Druva Government CMMC compliant?
Druva Government meets CMMC Level 2 requirements with 78% NIST 800-171 control coverage.
What NIST 800-171 controls does Druva Government cover?
Druva Government covers 78% of the 110 NIST 800-171 controls, with 2 gaps primarily in 3.5.7 and 3.8.1 control families.
What are the CMMC compliance gaps for Druva Government?
The primary gaps are in controls 3.5.7, 3.8.1. These require supplementary tools or process controls to achieve full CMMC Level 2 compliance.
Check Your Full Tech Stack
See CMMC readiness scores for 80+ enterprise vendors.
Open CMMC Readiness CheckTrack Druva Government CMMC readiness updates with AI-powered intelligence
Signals matches SAM.gov opportunities to your profile, monitors regulatory changes, and alerts you before competitors. Free for 90 days.
Start Free — 90 Days