CMMC Ready — CMMC Level 2
83% NIST 800-171 coverage. 2 control gaps identified.
CMMC Status
CMMC Ready
Target Level
Level 2
NIST Coverage
83%
Elastic Security Government
by Elastic
Overview
Elastic Security Government by Elastic is a cybersecurity solution with FedRAMP authorization targeting CMMC Level 2 compliance. It provides 83% coverage of NIST 800-171 controls for defense contractors handling CUI.
What This Means for Defense Contractors
Elastic Security Government meets the architectural requirements for CMMC Level 2. However, CMMC compliance depends on your entire system boundary — not just individual tools. There are 2 NIST 800-171 control gaps that need remediation before assessment. Defense contractors using Elastic Security Government should verify that their System Security Plan (SSP) documents how this tool fits within their authorization boundary.
NIST 800-171 Coverage
Control Gaps
Using Elastic Security Government without addressing these NIST 800-171 controls may result in findings during a CMMC assessment:
Strengths
Using Elastic Security Government in a CMMC Environment
For defense contractors already using Elastic Security Government, the path to CMMC compliance involves documenting the tool in your System Security Plan (SSP), ensuring proper access controls are configured, and validating that Elastic Security Government's security controls align with your authorization boundary. With 83% NIST 800-171 coverage, Elastic Security Government provides a strong compliance foundation, though the 2 remaining control gaps will need compensating controls or supplementary tools.
CMMC-Ready Cybersecurity Alternatives
CMMC Compliance Analysis for Elastic Security Government
Elastic Security Government demonstrates strong CMMC Level 2 readiness through its FedRAMP authorization and dedicated government cloud infrastructure, making it suitable for inclusion within a CMMC authorization boundary. The platform excels in Access Control (AC) and Audit and Accountability (AU) control families through robust role-based access controls and comprehensive SIEM capabilities that automatically generate audit trails for CUI handling activities. Its encryption implementations satisfy System and Communications Protection (SC) requirements for both data at rest and in transit. However, critical gaps exist in Media Protection (3.8.3) where Elastic lacks native sanitization capabilities for CUI-containing media, and Physical Protection (3.10.1) where the shared responsibility model requires additional contractor controls for physical access monitoring. During a C3PAO assessment, evaluators will scrutinize the government cloud deployment model and verify that all CUI processing occurs within FedRAMP-authorized boundaries. The platform's strength lies in its ability to centralize security event correlation across defense contractor networks, providing visibility into CUI access patterns and potential exfiltration attempts. Compared to competitors like Splunk Federal or IBM QRadar on Cloud, Elastic Security Government offers superior search capabilities and cost-effectiveness for mid-tier defense contractors. However, it requires more extensive configuration than turnkey solutions like Microsoft Sentinel for Government to achieve full CMMC compliance. A C3PAO will evaluate the platform's integration with existing contractor identity management systems and verify proper segregation of CUI workloads from other data classifications within the Elastic environment.
Configuration Guide
Configure Elastic Security Government with dedicated indices for CUI data processing, implementing field-level encryption for sensitive attributes and establishing retention policies aligned with NIST 800-171 requirements. Deploy Elastic Agent across all CUI-processing endpoints with centralized policy management through Fleet Server, ensuring comprehensive visibility into system activities per AU-3 and AU-12 controls. Integrate with contractor Active Directory using SAML 2.0 for centralized authentication while configuring multi-factor authentication for all administrative access to address IA-2 requirements. Implement custom detection rules for CUI-specific activities including unauthorized access attempts, data exfiltration patterns, and privileged account usage. Document compensating controls in the SSP for gaps 3.8.3 and 3.10.1, including manual media sanitization procedures and physical security monitoring protocols. Configure automated alerting for security incidents involving CUI with escalation procedures documented in incident response plans. Establish continuous monitoring through Elastic's ML-based anomaly detection for user behavior analytics and system performance baselines. Timeline estimate: 8-12 weeks for initial configuration, 4-6 weeks for integration testing, and 2-4 weeks for documentation updates. Maintain compliance through quarterly configuration reviews, monthly detection rule updates, and continuous security monitoring with documented remediation procedures. Prepare evidence packages including configuration exports, access logs, encryption verification reports, and incident response documentation for C3PAO review, ensuring all artifacts demonstrate compliance with identified NIST controls.
Configuration Checklist
- 1ISSO: Configure dedicated CUI data indices with appropriate retention policies and access controls per NIST 800-171 AU-4 and AU-11 requirements
- 2Sysadmin: Deploy Elastic Agent across all CUI-processing systems with centralized Fleet Server management to satisfy AU-3 audit generation controls
- 3ISSO: Integrate Active Directory authentication using SAML 2.0 and enforce MFA for administrative access addressing IA-2 identification requirements
- 4Sysadmin: Implement field-level encryption for CUI attributes within Elasticsearch indices to meet SC-13 cryptographic protection controls
- 5ISSO: Create custom detection rules for CUI access patterns, unauthorized activities, and data exfiltration attempts per SI-4 monitoring requirements
- 6ISSO: Document compensating controls for gaps 3.8.3 and 3.10.1 in SSP with detailed procedures and responsible parties identified
- 7Sysadmin: Configure automated incident alerting and escalation workflows for CUI-related security events per IR-4 response requirements
- 8ISSO: Establish continuous monitoring baselines using Elastic ML capabilities for anomaly detection across CUI environments per CA-7 controls
- 9Contracts: Verify Elastic Security Government FedRAMP authorization remains current and covers all planned CUI processing activities
- 10C3PAO: Prepare evidence packages including configuration exports, access logs, and encryption verification reports for assessment review
Related Compliance Assessments
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Elastic Security Government CMMC compliant?
Elastic Security Government meets CMMC Level 2 requirements with 83% NIST 800-171 control coverage.
What NIST 800-171 controls does Elastic Security Government cover?
Elastic Security Government covers 83% of the 110 NIST 800-171 controls, with 2 gaps primarily in 3.8.3 and 3.10.1 control families.
What are the CMMC compliance gaps for Elastic Security Government?
The primary gaps are in controls 3.8.3, 3.10.1. These require supplementary tools or process controls to achieve full CMMC Level 2 compliance.
Check Your Full Tech Stack
See CMMC readiness scores for 80+ enterprise vendors.
Open CMMC Readiness CheckTurn this gap analysis into a remediation plan
This Elastic Security Government readiness check is the start, not the answer. Book a 25-minute compliance assessment — you leave with a prioritized roadmap and a fixed-fee implementation quote.
Book a 25-min assessmentRelated: how much CMMC certification costs — DoD’s own priced figures