The F-35 Joint Program Office is accepting delivery of F-35 aircraft without their radars because of delays in the AN/APG-85 radar system from Northrop Grumman. Six Marine Corps F-35Bs have already been delivered with ballast in place of radars, and Air Force and Navy variants are expected to…

Breaking analysis of what happened and who is affected.
The F-35 Joint Program Office is accepting delivery of F-35 aircraft without their radars because of delays in the AN/APG-85 radar system from Northrop Grumman. Six Marine Corps F-35Bs have already been delivered with ballast in place of radars, and Air Force and Navy variants are expected to…
Read full report →Segment ImpactDeep dive into how this impacts each market segment.
The F-35 program is accepting aircraft delivered without radars because of delays in the AN/APG-85 radar system; six Marine Corps F-35Bs were delivered with ballast and Air Force and Navy variants will follow later this year.…
Read full report →Action KitActionable checklists and implementation guidance.
The F-35 Joint Program Office is accepting delivery of F-35 aircraft without radars because of delays in the AN/APG-85 radar system from Northrop Grumman. Six Marine Corps F-35Bs have already been delivered with ballast in place of operational radars, and Air Force and Navy variants are expected…
Read full report →The F-35 Joint Program Office is accepting delivery of F-35 aircraft without their radars because of delays in the AN/APG-85 radar system from Northrop Grumman. Six Marine Corps F-35Bs have already been delivered with ballast in place of radars, and Air Force and Navy variants are expected to follow later this year. This is a material program-management and supply-chain disruption for the F-35 Lightning II Program that affects prime and subcontractor delivery schedules and contract performance. Prime contractor Lockheed Martin and subcontractor Northrop Grumman are directly implicated by these delays. Contractors with exposure in radar systems, avionics, or aircraft production IDIQs should expect schedule and capture impacts and must reassess delivery risk, subcontract dependencies, and compliance obligations. Immediate actions should prioritize exposure assessment, capture pipeline rescoring, and close coordination with supply-chain and contracting leads.
A: The Summary reports delays in the AN/APG-85 radar system from Northrop Grumman; as a result, the F-35 Joint Program Office is accepting aircraft delivered with ballast in lieu of the radar.
A: Six United States Marine Corps F-35Bs have been delivered without radars; Air Force and Navy variants are reported to follow later this year.
A: This represents a program-management and supply-chain issue that affects prime and subcontractor delivery schedules and contract performance, with direct implications for Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. Specific contract impacts and remedies (including contract clauses or schedule adjustments) are pending source review.
Cabrillo Club already detected this event and delivered this briefing via the Cabrillo Signals War Room. Our platform ties this event to affected NAICS codes, agencies, and contract vehicles and triggers automated pipeline rescoring and capture alerts. Use these Cabrillo products to operationalize your response and keep decision-makers aligned:
Who to notify: Capture Manager — to rescore opportunities and reassess bids; Program Manager / Delivery Lead — to evaluate schedule and performance risk; Supply-Chain Lead — to validate subcontract schedules and mitigation; Contracts/Legal — to review contract remedies and reporting obligations; Security/Compliance Lead — to confirm ITAR/DFARS/CMMC impacts.
First 48-hour playbook
Primary hub: Winning Federal Contracts Guide (/insights/winning-federal-contracts)
Related guides: CMMC Compliance Guide (/insights/cmmc-compliance-guide), CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)-Safe CRM Guide (/insights/cui-safe-crm-guide)