Back to Insights
War RoomSeptember 14, 2026

Vengeance and Fury: US Air Force names new CCAs amid ambitious production goal

The U.S. Air Force has moved the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program from prototyping into production, naming the FQ-42A "Vengeance" (General Atomics) and FQ-44A "Fury" (Anduril) as fielded CCAs and requesting $2.37 billion in the FY2027 budget for the program.…

3 reports in this intelligence package
Blog post hero image

TL;DR

The U.S. Air Force has moved the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program from prototyping into production, naming the FQ-42A "Vengeance" (General Atomics) and FQ-44A "Fury" (Anduril) as fielded CCAs and requesting $2.37 billion in the FY2027 budget for the program. The service has set an ambitious goal to field at least 500 CCAs by 2032 and is pursuing complementary efforts such as Massed Modular Aircraft, which is targeting tens of thousands of units by 2030. This shift creates immediate, large-scale demand across autonomous systems, unmanned systems, AI/ML, and advanced manufacturing supply chains and will require rapid industrial scaling and likely continued congressional support. Defense contractors with capabilities across the specified market segments, the listed NAICS codes, and compliance surfaces should treat this as a high-priority capture and resourcing opportunity. Short-term implications include prioritized award activity, IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity)/OTA pursuit plans, and accelerated requirements for compliance posture and production-readiness. Expect downstream solicitations and scaling-related requirements to appear; prepare capture plans and compliance artifacts now.

Key Points

  • What happened: The Air Force announced production for CCAs with the FQ-42A "Vengeance" and FQ-44A "Fury" in production and requested $2.37 billion in the FY2027 budget to field at least 500 CCAs by 2032; related Massed Modular Aircraft efforts target tens of thousands by 2030.
  • Who is affected: NAICS 336411, 336413, 334511, 541712, 541715, 336414; Agencies: DOD, USAF; Market segments: Defense, Aerospace, Autonomous Systems, Unmanned Systems, AI/ML, Advanced Manufacturing; Contract vehicles: IDIQ, OTA; Compliance surfaces: CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification), NIST 800-171 (NIST Special Publication 800-171), ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations), DFARS (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement), EAR.
  • Timeline: FY2027 budget request included; fielding goal of at least 500 CCAs by 2032; Massed Modular Aircraft targeting tens of thousands by 2030.
  • What contractors should do NOW: immediately assess capacity and supply-chain scalability, update capture pipelines and IDIQ/OTA pursuit lists, validate CMMC/NIST 800-171/ITAR/DFARS/EAR posture, stand up win-theme proposals in parallel, and configure Cabrillo monitoring and proposal systems to prioritize CCA- and Massed Modular–related opportunities.

Who Is Affected

Primary impacts will fall on defense prime contractors, subsystem and component manufacturers, systems integrators, AI/ML and autonomy integrators, and advanced manufacturing providers operating in the listed market segments. Specific NAICS codes, agencies, and contract vehicles are listed in Segmentation above and should be assumed in-scope: 336411, 336413, 334511, 541712, 541715, 336414; DOD and USAF; IDIQ and OTA. Compliance regimes to validate immediately include CMMC, NIST 800-171, ITAR, DFARS, and EAR.

If you need program-level solicitations or agency source lists, expect those to appear on procurement feeds; Cabrillo monitoring will surface them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does the FY2027 budget request include procurement funding for CCAs?

A: Yes — the Summary states the FY2027 budget request includes $2.37 billion for the CCA program.

Q: Which platforms and manufacturers are in production now?

A: The Summary identifies the FQ-42A "Vengeance" in production by General Atomics and the FQ-44A "Fury" in production by Anduril.

Q: How large is the broader effort and what is the timescale?

A: The Air Force set a goal to field at least 500 CCAs by 2032. Related Massed Modular Aircraft efforts are targeting tens of thousands of units by 2030. Continued congressional support and industry scaling are noted as requirements; further procurement timing and solicitation details are pending source review.

Definitions

  • Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCAs): Air vehicles intended to operate collaboratively with manned aircraft to augment combat capability; now the focus of a production push per the Summary.
  • FQ-42A "Vengeance": The CCA designated in the Summary as in production by General Atomics.
  • FQ-44A "Fury": The CCA designated in the Summary as in production by Anduril.
  • Massed Modular Aircraft: A related program referenced in the Summary targeting tens of thousands of units by 2030.

Intelligence Response

  • Cabrillo Signals War Room — Already detected this event and delivered this briefing. We flag the FY2027 budget request and the production announcements as high-severity for capture activity and resource planning. Continuous monitoring of related budget actions, congressional language, and downstream solicitations is enabled.
  • Cabrillo Signals Match Engine — Automatically rescoring opportunity pipelines so that CCA- and Massed Modular–adjacent opportunities rise to the top of pursuit lists and historical win-probability models adjust for increased competition and spend.
  • Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub — Tracking the listed NAICS codes, DOD/USAF activity, and contract vehicle types (IDIQ, OTA). Saved searches will alert teams when follow-on solicitations appear on SAM.gov (System for Award Management) and related procurement feeds.
  • Proposal Studio (Proposal OS) & Proposal Studio Workflow Tracker — Use Proposal Studio to assemble compliance matrices, capture win themes, and generate proposal skeletons; use Workflow Tracker for 9-gate capture management, automated compliance routing, and audit-ready documentation.

Who to notify:

  • BD Director / Capture Manager — immediate pursuit decision and resourcing.
  • Head of Manufacturing / COO — assess scale and production readiness.
  • CTO / Autonomy Lead — validate AI/ML and autonomy tech roadmap.
  • Compliance Officer / Security Lead — validate CMMC, NIST 800-171, ITAR/DFARS/EAR posture.
  • Proposal Lead — begin proposal build in Proposal Studio and engage Workflow Tracker.

First 48-hour playbook:

  • Hour 0–4: Notify the roles above; ingest this briefing into Cabrillo Signals War Room watchlists; run Match Engine rescoring to reprioritize pipeline; start an immediate bid/no-bid assessment.
  • Hour 4–12: Stand up a capture cell, assign Proposal Studio workspace, create compliance matrix (CMMC, NIST 800-171, ITAR, DFARS, EAR), and schedule manufacturing-capacity assessment.
  • Hour 12–24: Populate Proposal Studio with initial win themes and solution outline; use Intelligence Hub saved searches for identifications of IDIQ/OTA or RFP activity; route compliance checkpoints in Workflow Tracker.
  • Hour 24–48: Finalize capture plan, refine cost/production estimates, prepare IDIQ/OTA pursuit materials, and set continuous monitoring alerts for related solicitations and Congressional language.

Further reading and resources:

  • Winning Federal Contracts Guide (/insights/winning-federal-contracts)
  • CMMC Compliance Guide (/insights/cmmc-compliance-guide)
  • CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)-Safe CRM Guide (/insights/cui-safe-crm-guide)