Federal Register: National Industrial Security Program
This final rule removes the DoD's regulations on the National Industrial Security Program (NISP) regarding industrial security procedures and practices related to foreign ownership, control, or influence (FOCI) for U.S. Government activities. The interim final rule currently in effect is duplicative
Cabrillo Club
Editorial Team · February 17, 2026

Also in this intelligence package
Breaking analysis of what happened and who is affected.
Read report →Flash BriefBreaking analysis of what happened and who is affected.
Read report →Segment ImpactDeep dive into how this impacts each market segment.
Read report →Action KitActionable checklists and implementation guidance.
Read report →Action KitActionable checklists and implementation guidance.
Segment Impact Analysis: NISP FOCI Regulation Consolidation
Executive Summary
The consolidation of National Industrial Security Program (NISP) Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI) regulations under NARA's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) represents a significant administrative streamlining with profound implications for cleared contractors. By eliminating DoD (Department of Defense)'s duplicative regulations, this policy change creates a single authoritative source for FOCI compliance requirements, reducing regulatory ambiguity but also eliminating the ability to leverage agency-specific interpretations. This shift affects all contractors holding facility clearances (FCLs), particularly those with complex ownership structures, foreign investment, or pending M&A activities.
The immediate impact centers on compliance documentation, corporate governance structures, and security agreement negotiations. Contractors who have historically navigated between DoD and other agency interpretations of FOCI mitigation must now align exclusively with ISOO/DCSA standards under 32 CFR Part 2004. This consolidation arrives amid increased scrutiny of foreign investment in the defense industrial base and growing concerns about supply chain security, making FOCI mitigation more critical than ever for maintaining competitive positioning.
The most significant market impact will be felt by mid-tier contractors seeking growth capital, defense primes with international subsidiaries, and emerging technology companies in dual-use sectors where foreign venture capital is prevalent. Contractors who proactively restructure their corporate governance and security arrangements to align with the unified ISOO framework will gain faster clearance processing times and reduced administrative burden, while those who delay risk extended FOCI reviews that can freeze business development activities for 6-12 months.
Impact Matrix
Defense Primes & Large Systems Integrators
- Risk Level: Medium
- Opportunity: Streamlined FOCI compliance across multiple cleared subsidiaries and international joint ventures. The single regulatory framework enables standardization of Special Security Agreements (SSAs), Proxy Agreements (PAs), and Voting Trust Agreements (VTAs) across their corporate portfolio, reducing legal costs and administrative overhead by an estimated 20-30%.
- Timeline: Q2-Q3 2025 for comprehensive review; Q4 2025 for implementation of standardized frameworks
- Action Required: Conduct enterprise-wide audit of all existing FOCI mitigation instruments across subsidiaries; consolidate and standardize security agreement templates; retrain corporate security officers on unified ISOO standards; update M&A due diligence protocols to reflect single-source FOCI requirements.
- Competitive Edge: Establish a "FOCI Center of Excellence" that provides rapid FOCI assessment services to acquisition targets, enabling faster deal closure. Create pre-negotiated SSA templates with DCSA that can be deployed within 30 days for new acquisitions, compared to industry average of 90-180 days. Leverage standardized framework to pitch international partners on streamlined joint venture structures, winning deals where competitors face regulatory uncertainty.
Mid-Tier Contractors ($100M-$1B Revenue)
- Risk Level: High
- Opportunity: Clarity on FOCI requirements removes a major barrier to accessing growth capital from private equity and venture capital sources. The unified framework provides predictable pathways for foreign investment up to negation thresholds, enabling mid-tiers to compete for capital-intensive programs previously dominated by primes.
- Timeline: Immediate action required for contractors in active fundraising; 6-month window for those planning 2025-2026 capital raises
- Action Required: Engage FOCI specialists to model ownership structures under consolidated ISOO rules; prepare pre-clearance packages for potential investors; establish board governance structures that accommodate security control requirements; document technology control plans that satisfy FOCI mitigation without operational restrictions.
- Competitive Edge: Develop "clearance-ready" investment packages that include pre-vetted FOCI mitigation structures, reducing investor due diligence time by 60-90 days. Create tiered ownership structures that allow foreign investment in non-cleared subsidiaries while maintaining 100% U.S. ownership of cleared entities. Partner with specialized private equity firms experienced in cleared contractor investments to access capital at 15-20% lower cost than traditional sources. Market this capability to win contracts that competitors cannot pursue due to capital constraints.
Cybersecurity & IT Services Contractors
- Risk Level: High
- Opportunity: The unified FOCI framework clarifies requirements for cloud service providers, managed security service providers (MSSPs), and IT contractors handling classified data. This enables faster FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) High and DoD Impact Level 5/6 authorizations when combined with proper FOCI mitigation, opening access to $8B+ in annual classified cloud and cyber contracts.
- Timeline: 90-120 days for initial compliance assessment; 6-9 months for full implementation
- Action Required: Review all foreign-sourced software, hardware, and personnel in delivery chain; document supply chain security controls that satisfy FOCI concerns; implement technical controls (network segregation, access controls, data sovereignty) that support FOCI mitigation; obtain legal opinions on ownership structure compliance with unified standards.
- Competitive Edge: Achieve "FOCI-mitigated cloud" certification that enables pursuit of classified cloud contracts worth $50M-$200M that most commercial cloud providers cannot access. Develop proprietary network architecture that physically and logically separates foreign-accessible systems from cleared environments, enabling retention of international talent while maintaining clearances. Create rapid FOCI assessment tools for software supply chain that reduce security review time from months to weeks, winning time-sensitive contracts. Package this capability as a "Cleared Cloud" offering with 40-50% premium pricing over commercial alternatives.
Emerging Technology & Dual-Use Contractors
- Risk Level: Critical
- Opportunity: Consolidation provides clear guidance for AI, quantum computing, advanced materials, and biotechnology companies that have historically received foreign VC funding. The unified framework enables these contractors to pursue DoD innovation programs (SBIR/STTR, DIU, AFWERX) while maintaining commercial investor relationships through properly structured FOCI mitigation.
- Timeline: Immediate action for companies in active DoD procurement; 30-60 days for those planning to pursue classified work
- Action Required: Conduct immediate ownership analysis to identify FOCI triggers; establish separate cleared subsidiaries or divisions with independent boards; implement technology control plans that restrict foreign investor access to classified work while allowing commercial collaboration; prepare FOCI mitigation proposals before submitting bids for classified programs.
- Competitive Edge: Create "dual-track" corporate structures where a U.S.-owned cleared subsidiary licenses technology from a foreign-funded parent company, enabling access to both DoD classified budgets and commercial VC funding. Develop proprietary IP segmentation strategies that allow foreign investors to fund commercial R&D while DoD funds classified applications, effectively doubling available capital. Establish relationships with DCSA early in company lifecycle to pre-negotiate FOCI mitigation approaches, reducing time-to-clearance from 12-18 months to 4-6 months. Market this capability to win prototype contracts worth $3M-$10M that competitors cannot pursue due to foreign investment complications.
Professional Services & Consulting Firms
- Risk Level: Medium
- Opportunity: Unified FOCI standards enable consulting firms to develop standardized advisory services for FOCI mitigation, corporate restructuring, and M&A support. The elimination of agency-specific interpretations creates demand for expertise in the single ISOO framework, with potential for 30-40% growth in security consulting revenue.
- Timeline: Q2 2025 for service development; Q3 2025 for market launch
- Action Required: Train consultants on consolidated ISOO FOCI requirements; develop standardized assessment tools and mitigation templates; create partnership networks with legal firms specializing in FOCI; build case studies demonstrating successful FOCI mitigation under new framework.
- Competitive Edge: Develop proprietary "FOCI Readiness Score" assessment tool that provides 48-hour evaluation of contractor FOCI posture, marketed to private equity firms conducting due diligence on cleared contractor acquisitions. Create subscription-based "FOCI Monitoring Service" that alerts clients to ownership changes, foreign investment, or corporate events that trigger FOCI reviews, preventing compliance violations. Establish preferred provider relationships with DCSA by demonstrating deep expertise in unified framework, gaining informal input on mitigation approaches before formal submission. Package these services to win 5-10 year retainer contracts worth $500K-$2M annually from mid-tier contractors and private equity firms.
Small Business & SDVOSB Contractors
- Risk Level: Medium
- Opportunity: Simplified, single-source FOCI guidance reduces compliance costs and complexity for small businesses seeking facility clearances. This levels the playing field with larger contractors who have dedicated security staff, enabling small businesses to compete for classified contracts in the $1M-$10M range that were previously administratively prohibitive.
- Timeline: 60-90 days for initial compliance; ongoing monitoring required
- Action Required: Document ownership structure and foreign connections; establish simple corporate governance that satisfies FOCI requirements without expensive legal structures; implement basic technology controls for foreign-sourced equipment or software; join industry associations that provide FOCI guidance and templates for small businesses.
- Competitive Edge: Partner with other small businesses to share FOCI compliance costs through joint security arrangements, reducing per-company costs by 60-70%. Develop niche expertise in specific technology areas (AI, quantum, biotech) where FOCI mitigation is complex, positioning as the "cleared small business" alternative to foreign-funded competitors. Leverage SBA mentor-protégé relationships with large primes to access their FOCI expertise and security infrastructure, winning subcontracts worth $2M-$5M. Market FOCI-mitigated status prominently in capability statements to differentiate from competitors who cannot obtain clearances due to foreign investment.
International Defense Contractors & Joint Ventures
- Risk Level: High
- Opportunity: Clear, unified FOCI standards provide predictable framework for international companies establishing U.S. subsidiaries to access DoD contracts. The consolidated regulations enable structured approaches to Special Security Agreements that protect parent company IP while allowing U.S. subsidiary to compete for classified work worth $10M-$100M+ annually.
- Timeline: 9-12 months for new market entry; 3-6 months for existing contractors to align with unified framework
- Action Required: Establish independently operated U.S. subsidiary with separate board, management, and facilities; implement robust technology control plans and network segregation; negotiate SSA or Proxy Agreement with DCSA; demonstrate that U.S. operations are insulated from foreign parent influence.
- Competitive Edge: Develop "turnkey cleared subsidiary" model that can be replicated across multiple international partners, creating consulting revenue stream of $500K-$1M per implementation. Establish U.S. subsidiary as the "cleared gateway" for multiple international partners, aggregating their technologies and marketing integrated solutions to DoD, winning prime contracts worth $25M-$75M. Leverage parent company's international customer base to win FMS contracts where cleared U.S. subsidiary provides classified components, creating $50M+ revenue opportunities. Position as the "trusted international partner" that has mastered FOCI mitigation, winning sole-source contracts where DoD needs specific foreign technology but requires U.S.-cleared delivery.
Cross-Segment Implications
Supply Chain Consolidation: The unified FOCI framework will accelerate vertical integration as primes acquire mid-tier contractors with complex ownership structures at discounted valuations. Mid-tiers facing expensive FOCI mitigation may choose acquisition over independent restructuring, creating 15-20% increase in defense M&A activity in 2025-2026. Small businesses should position as acquisition targets for primes seeking to expand cleared capacity quickly.
Capital Market Restructuring: Private equity firms and venture capital investors will demand FOCI-compliant corporate structures as a condition of investment, shifting negotiating leverage toward contractors who have pre-mitigated FOCI concerns. This creates a two-tier market where FOCI-ready contractors access capital at 20-30% lower cost than those requiring post-investment restructuring. Emerging technology companies must choose between foreign VC funding (requiring complex mitigation) or lower-return U.S. government investment vehicles (SBIR, DIU).
Technology Transfer Controls: The consolidated framework's emphasis on technology control plans will drive increased segmentation between classified and unclassified business units. Contractors will establish separate legal entities, facilities, and IT infrastructure to isolate classified work from foreign-accessible operations, increasing operational costs by 15-25% but enabling pursuit of both commercial and classified markets. This particularly affects dual-use technology contractors in AI, quantum, and biotechnology sectors.
Competitive Realignment: Contractors who achieve rapid FOCI mitigation under the unified framework will gain 6-12 month time-to-market advantage over competitors still navigating compliance. This window enables capture of key program positions before competitors can compete, particularly in emerging technology areas where DoD is rapidly classifying previously unclassified work. First-movers will establish incumbent positions worth $10M-$50M in annual revenue that are difficult to displace.
International Partnership Models: The clarity of unified FOCI standards will enable new international joint venture structures where U.S. cleared entities partner with foreign companies on specific programs through carefully structured SSAs. This creates opportunities for U.S. mid-tier contractors to access foreign technology and capital while maintaining clearances, enabling competition against primes on international programs worth $25M-$100M. However, this requires sophisticated legal and security infrastructure that favors larger, well-capitalized contractors.
Compliance Cost Redistribution: While large primes will see reduced compliance costs through standardization, small and mid-tier contractors may face increased costs as the single ISOO framework eliminates agency-specific accommodations they previously leveraged. This 10-15% compliance cost increase for smaller contractors will drive consolidation and partnership arrangements, with implications for small business set-aside competition and subcontracting opportunities.
How ready are you for CMMC?
Take our free readiness assessment. 10 questions, instant results, no email required until you want your report.
Check Your CMMC ReadinessCabrillo Club
Editorial Team
Cabrillo Club helps government contractors win more contracts with AI-powered proposal automation and compliance solutions.
Continue reading
Breaking analysis of what happened and who is affected.
Read report →Flash BriefBreaking analysis of what happened and who is affected.
Read report →Segment ImpactDeep dive into how this impacts each market segment.
Read report →Action KitActionable checklists and implementation guidance.
Read report →Action KitActionable checklists and implementation guidance.