Partially Ready — CMMC Level 2
74% NIST 800-171 coverage. 4 control gaps identified.
CMMC Status
Partially Ready
Target Level
Level 2
NIST Coverage
74%
Veritas Government
by Veritas Technologies
Overview
Veritas Government by Veritas Technologies is a backup & recovery solution pursuing FedRAMP authorization targeting CMMC Level 2 compliance. It provides 74% coverage of NIST 800-171 controls for defense contractors handling CUI.
What This Means for Defense Contractors
Veritas Government meets the architectural requirements for CMMC Level 2. However, CMMC compliance depends on your entire system boundary — not just individual tools. There are 4 NIST 800-171 control gaps that need remediation before assessment. Defense contractors using Veritas Government should verify that their System Security Plan (SSP) documents how this tool fits within their authorization boundary.
NIST 800-171 Coverage
Control Gaps
Using Veritas Government without addressing these NIST 800-171 controls may result in findings during a CMMC assessment:
Strengths
Using Veritas Government in a CMMC Environment
Defense contractors using Veritas Government should be aware that its 74% NIST 800-171 coverage leaves 26% of controls unaddressed. While Veritas Government can be part of your CMMC environment, you will need compensating controls and supplementary tools to close the 4 identified gaps before a C3PAO assessment. Document all compensating controls in your POA&M and ensure your SSP accurately reflects the shared responsibility model.
Need a Compliant Alternative?
Veritas Government doesn't meet CMMC Level 2. Get real-time alerts when compliant alternatives become available, plus AI-matched contract opportunities for your NAICS codes.
CMMC-Ready Backup & Recovery Alternatives
CMMC Compliance Analysis for Veritas Government
Veritas Government presents a mixed CMMC posture for defense contractors handling CUI in backup operations. As an enterprise-class backup solution pursuing FedRAMP authorization, it demonstrates strong foundational security with audit logging, SIEM integration, and zero-trust architecture support. However, its 74% NIST 800-171 coverage creates significant compliance gaps that could jeopardize CMMC Level 2 certification. In typical defense contractor workflows, Veritas Government would backup CUI from engineering workstations, email systems, and project repositories. The solution excels in Access Control (3.1.x) and System and Information Integrity (3.14.x) families through its comprehensive audit logging and enterprise data governance capabilities. However, critical failures in Media Protection (3.8.1, 3.8.3), Maintenance (3.10.1), and Risk Assessment (3.11.2) controls create substantial vulnerabilities. During a C3PAO assessment, evaluators would scrutinize backup media sanitization procedures, maintenance authentication protocols, and vulnerability scanning implementation. The gaps in 3.8.1 and 3.8.3 are particularly concerning as they directly impact CUI data lifecycle management. This tool can exist within a CMMC authorization boundary, but only after addressing control gaps through compensating controls or vendor remediation. Compared to competitors like Acronis Cyber Backup or Commvault, Veritas Government offers superior enterprise governance but lags in out-of-the-box CMMC compliance. The pending FedRAMP authorization provides confidence in the vendor's commitment to federal security standards, making remediation efforts worthwhile for contractors requiring enterprise-scale backup capabilities.
Remediation Plan
Address the four NIST control gaps through a phased 12-16 week remediation approach. For 3.8.1 (media protection), implement documented procedures for sanitizing backup media using NIST SP 800-88 guidelines and configure automated encryption for all backup destinations. For 3.8.3 (media marking), establish labeling protocols for physical backup media and implement metadata tagging for cloud-based backups indicating CUI sensitivity levels. Address 3.10.1 (maintenance) by configuring multi-factor authentication for all maintenance personnel access and implementing privileged access management controls for vendor support activities. For 3.11.2 (vulnerability scanning), integrate Veritas Government with existing vulnerability management tools or implement scheduled security assessments of the backup infrastructure. Document compensating controls in the SSP including: network segmentation isolating backup infrastructure, additional monitoring through SIEM integration, and regular backup integrity testing. Implement continuous monitoring through automated compliance reporting, quarterly backup security assessments, and monthly review of access logs. Timeline: Weeks 1-4 focus on 3.8.1/3.8.3 media controls, Weeks 5-8 address 3.10.1 maintenance controls, Weeks 9-12 implement 3.11.2 vulnerability management, and Weeks 13-16 complete documentation and testing. Prepare evidence including configuration screenshots, policy documents, testing results, and vendor compliance attestations for C3PAO review. Establish ongoing compliance validation through quarterly assessments and annual penetration testing of backup systems.
Remediation Checklist
- 1Configure ISSO to implement automated encryption for all Veritas Government backup destinations per NIST 800-171 3.8.1 requirements
- 2Document sysadmin procedures for backup media sanitization using NIST SP 800-88 guidelines to address control 3.8.1
- 3Establish ISSO-led labeling protocols for physical backup media and configure metadata tagging for CUI sensitivity per 3.8.3
- 4Deploy sysadmin-managed multi-factor authentication for all maintenance personnel accessing Veritas Government systems per 3.10.1
- 5Integrate contracts team to negotiate vendor support authentication requirements and maintenance access controls for 3.10.1 compliance
- 6Configure sysadmin vulnerability scanning integration between Veritas Government infrastructure and existing security tools per 3.11.2
- 7Update ISSO SSP documentation with compensating controls including network segmentation and additional monitoring controls
- 8Implement sysadmin quarterly backup security assessments and monthly access log reviews for continuous monitoring
- 9Prepare ISSO evidence package including configuration screenshots, policy documents, and testing results for C3PAO assessment
- 10Schedule C3PAO preliminary review of remediation efforts and compliance evidence before formal assessment
Estimated Compliance Cost
Initial remediation costs range from $45,000-$75,000 including professional services for control implementation, security tool integration, and documentation updates. This includes approximately $25,000 for security consulting, $15,000-$25,000 for additional security tools (PAM, vulnerability scanning), and $5,000-$25,000 for staff training and documentation. Annual ongoing costs total $20,000-$35,000 covering continuous monitoring tools, quarterly compliance assessments, and annual security testing. Continuous monitoring adds $8,000-$12,000 annually for automated compliance reporting and SIEM integration enhancements. Timeline spans 12-16 weeks for full remediation and compliance validation. Cost variables include organization size, existing security infrastructure, and whether additional backup encryption or privileged access management tools are required. Organizations with existing PAM solutions and vulnerability management tools will trend toward lower cost estimates.
Compliance Cross-References
Non-compliance with Veritas Government's identified gaps creates cascading violations across multiple frameworks. DFARS 252.204-7012 requires adequate security for CUI, and gaps in 3.8.1 (media protection) and 3.8.3 (media marking) directly violate CUI handling requirements. DFARS 252.204-7021 mandates NIST 800-171 compliance, making the 26% coverage gap a contract compliance issue. The four control gaps span critical NIST 800-171 families: Media Protection (MP) family gaps in 3.8.1 and 3.8.3 affect CUI data lifecycle management, Maintenance (MA) family gap in 3.10.1 impacts system security during vendor support, and Risk Assessment (RA) family gap in 3.11.2 prevents adequate security monitoring. In CMMC Level 2 assessment domains, these gaps affect Access Control (AC), Media Protection (MP), Maintenance (MA), and Risk Assessment (RA) domains, potentially causing assessment failures across 4 of 17 domains. The pending FedRAMP authorization provides some confidence in vendor security commitment, but FedRAMP Moderate baseline doesn't fully align with NIST 800-171 requirements. Until control gaps are addressed, organizations using Veritas Government face potential DCMA DIBCAC compliance findings, contract award restrictions, and C3PAO assessment failures.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Veritas Government CMMC compliant?
Veritas Government partially meets CMMC requirements with 74% coverage. 4 control gaps need remediation.
What NIST 800-171 controls does Veritas Government cover?
Veritas Government covers 74% of the 110 NIST 800-171 controls, with 4 gaps primarily in 3.8.1 and 3.8.3 control families.
What are the CMMC compliance gaps for Veritas Government?
The primary gaps are in controls 3.8.1, 3.8.3, 3.10.1, 3.11.2. These require supplementary tools or process controls to achieve full CMMC Level 2 compliance.
Check Your Full Tech Stack
See CMMC readiness scores for 80+ enterprise vendors.
Open CMMC Readiness CheckTrack Veritas Government CMMC readiness updates with AI-powered intelligence
Signals matches SAM.gov opportunities to your profile, monitors regulatory changes, and alerts you before competitors. Free for 90 days.
Start Free — 90 Days