‘Pay and chase’ is a confession. We should stop treating it as a fraud-fighting strategy.

Overview

A former chief of staff to the U.S. CIO has argued that the federal government’s long-standing “pay and chase” approach to fraud in benefits programs is a flawed operating doctrine. For contractors that serve benefits programs, this critique signals potential shifts in procurement priorities, evaluation criteria, and agency expectations toward preventing fraud up-front rather than recovering funds after payment. Action is needed now because policy debates and agency priorities can ripple into solicitations, statement-of-works, and task-order evaluations — favoring offerors who can demonstrate proactive fraud-detection and prevention capabilities. Contractors should reassess how their solutions and proposals are positioned, update capture strategies to highlight front-end controls, and monitor for formal guidance from agencies and oversight offices. Preparing now preserves competitive advantage and reduces the risk of being excluded when agencies pivot away from “pay and chase” models.

Immediate Actions (This Week)

• [ ] Monitor agency and oversight communications and news coverage (starting with the FedScoop article cited in the event) for statements that indicate a policy shift away from “pay and chase.”
• [ ] Identify current contracts, task orders, and active proposals that involve benefits program delivery or fraud-recovery work and flag any reliance on post-payment recovery as the primary fraud strategy.
• [ ] Convene a short cross-functional briefing (capture, legal, delivery, product) to review messaging and decide whether to reframe offerings around up-front fraud prevention.
• [ ] Update your capture pipeline entries to flag opportunities involving benefits programs so you can re-score priorities if agencies signal change.
• [ ] Prepare a brief capability summary that emphasizes proactive fraud-detection, analytics, and preventative controls to share with agency contacts and capture teams.

Short-Term Actions (30 Days)

• [ ] Run a tabletop or war‑room session to map how a shift away from “pay and chase” would change statement-of-work requirements, deliverables, and pricing on your benefits-related contracts.
• [ ] Refresh proposal templates, technical approaches, and past-performance calls to highlight examples of front-end prevention, real-time analytics, and program integrity work.
• [ ] Reach out to agency program and contracting contacts (where appropriate) to ask whether they anticipate changes to fraud-management requirements or evaluation factors.
• [ ] Start assembling any evidence, metrics, and case studies that demonstrate reduced improper payments through prevention rather than recovery.

Long-Term Actions (90+ Days)

• [ ] Invest in or package service offerings and delivery models that emphasize up-front detection and prevention (policy reviews, data analytics, identity-proofing, adjudication support) and incorporate those into your capture playbooks.
• [ ] Train capture and proposal teams to position anti-fraud solutions around prevention, showing measurable outcomes and lower lifecycle costs versus “pay and chase.”
• [ ] Track and document any agency guidance or solicitation language changes that institutionalize prevention-focused requirements; feed findings into product roadmaps and staffing plans.
• [ ] Build or refine metrics and dashboards you can present in proposals to quantify fraud-prevention impact (reduction in improper payments, prevented claims, program integrity KPIs).

Compliance Checklist

Compliance scope TBD — re-evaluate when official guidance is published.

• [ ] Document current fraud-detection and mitigation controls used across benefits program work and identify gaps relative to prevention-focused expectations.
• [ ] Maintain audit-ready documentation of program-integrity activities, evidence of prevented improper payments, and internal control effectiveness for inclusion in proposals and post-award audits.

Resources

• The FedScoop article cited in the event: https://fedscoop.com/federal-government-fraud-pay-and-chase/
• Winning Federal Contracts Guide (/insights/winning-federal-contracts)
• CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) Compliance Guide (/insights/cmmc-compliance-guide)
• CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)-Safe CRM Guide (/insights/cui-safe-crm-guide)

How Cabrillo Club Automates This

• Cabrillo Signals War Room — Already detected this event and delivered this briefing within minutes. For subscribers, War Room will keep monitoring the conversation and any formal guidance or procurement signals from relevant federal offices (including the U.S. CIO reference in the briefing). It will surface follow-on developments so your capture team does not miss shifts in policy or agency messaging about fraud-management strategy.
• Cabrillo Signals Match Engine — When agencies begin to prefer prevention-centered approaches, the Match Engine will automatically rescore your opportunity pipeline to reflect changed keyword relevance and agency alignment. That lets you rapidly re-prioritize bids where your front-end fraud-prevention capabilities increase your competitive score.
• Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub — Use the Intelligence Hub’s tracking and saved-search features to watch for solicitations and amendments that reference prevention, program integrity, or changes to benefits-program fraud policies. Configure alerts so SAM.gov (System for Award Management) and agency postings that match a prevention-focused profile trigger immediate notifications to capture teams.
• Proposal Studio (Proposal OS) — Proposal Studio will accelerate producing proposal content that reframes offerings around fraud prevention: it generates compliance matrices, pulls win themes from your library, and drafts technical approaches using past-performance instances where prevention produced measurable results. The bid/no-bid engine will factor this event into its recommendation so you make faster capture decisions.
• Proposal Studio Workflow Tracker — The Workflow Tracker enforces a consistent 9-gate capture process for any opportunity that may be affected by a shift away from “pay and chase.” It automatically routes compliance and legal reviews, tracks supplier and staffing certifications needed for prevention services, and compiles audit-ready documentation packages to support proposals and post-award compliance.

Explore these features to convert this policy signal into capture advantage: use War Room and the Intelligence Hub to stay ahead of guidance, Match Engine to re-score your pipeline, and Proposal Studio + Workflow Tracker to produce prevention-focused proposals at scale.

---

If you want, we can convert this Action Kit into a tailored capture checklist for a specific opportunity — send the opportunity notice or summary and we’ll map a 9-gate workflow and proposal timeline.