Site Selections Announced for Directed-Energy Counter-Drone Program
On behalf of the War Department, Joint Interagency Task Force 401 selected five installations to participate in the directed-energy counter-unmanned aircraft systems pilot program included in the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act.
Cabrillo Club
Editorial Team · May 6, 2026 · 17 min read
Cabrillo Club Insights
Site Selections Announced for Directed-Energy Counter-Drone Program
FLASH BRIEF: DIRECTED-ENERGY COUNTER-DRONE PROGRAM SITE SELECTIONS
Classification: CRITICAL
Event Type: Budget Action
Date Issued: 2025-05-01
Distribution: Defense Industrial Base, Counter-UAS Contractors, Directed Energy Developers
---
TL;DR
Joint Interagency Task Force 401 has announced five military installations selected for the FY2026 directed-energy counter-UAS pilot program, triggering immediate procurement activity across a $400M+ opportunity landscape. This selection accelerates the Army's transition from prototype to program-of-record for laser and high-power microwave systems, with the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO) preparing a 2026 competition for counter-drone laser weapons. Contractors in NAICS 334511 (Search, Detection, Navigation), 336414 (Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing), and 541715 (R&D in Physical, Engineering Sciences) face compressed timelines to position for installation-specific integration contracts, O&M support, and follow-on production awards. The Army has already deployed 11 of 17 directed-energy prototypes, including four DE M-SHORAD systems to CENTCOM, establishing proven operational baselines that will inform technical requirements. With $69.1M in FY2025 M-SHORAD procurement funding and $315M in RDT&E already allocated, contractors must immediately validate CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) compliance (/insights/cmmc-compliance-guide), confirm ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations)/EAR registration, and prepare for rapid-turnaround RFIs expected within 60-90 days. This pilot program represents the Department's commitment to operationalizing directed energy as a cost-per-kill solution against Group 1-3 UAS threats, with speed-of-light engagement and magazine depth advantages over kinetic interceptors. Firms without active SAM.gov (System for Award Management) monitoring, pre-positioned teaming agreements, and installation-specific threat assessments risk exclusion from first-wave solicitations on OASIS+, ASTRO, and JETS contract vehicles.
---
Key Points
- What Happened: Joint Interagency Task Force 401 selected five military installations for the directed-energy counter-UAS pilot program authorized in the FY2026 NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), transitioning Army RCCTO prototypes (10kW to 300kW systems) from experimentation to operational deployment with procurement competitions launching in 2026.
- Who Is Affected: Prime contractors and subcontractors in directed energy weapons, counter-UAS integration, electronic warfare, installation security, and R&D services across DOD and Army agencies; firms holding or pursuing positions on OASIS+, ASTRO, and JETS vehicles; companies requiring CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171 (NIST Special Publication 800-171), ITAR, and DFARS (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement) 252.204-7012 compliance for CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) handling.
- Timeline: RFIs expected Q3-Q4 2026 for installation-specific integration contracts; Army RCCTO competition for counter-drone laser weapon launches 2026; FY2026 budget execution begins October 2025 with $16.867M Directed Energy Center of Excellence funding; follow-on production decisions tied to pilot program performance metrics through FY2027-2028.
- Immediate Actions Required: Validate CMMC compliance status and initiate assessments if not Level 2 certified; configure SAM.gov saved searches for the five selected installations and counter-UAS keywords; identify teaming partners with installation access and O&M experience; prepare capability statements highlighting relevant prototype integration, laser/HPM technology, or C-UAS command-and-control expertise; review Winning Federal Contracts Guide (/insights/winning-federal-contracts) for capture positioning strategies.
---
Who Is Affected
NAICS Codes Impacted:
- 334511 (Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Systems) — Primary for sensor integration and targeting systems
- 336414 (Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing) — Directed energy weapon platforms and integration
- 541330 (Engineering Services) — Installation site preparation, integration engineering, test and evaluation
- 541712 (R&D in Physical, Engineering, Life Sciences - except Biotech) — Laser physics, high-power microwave development
- 541715 (R&D in Physical, Engineering, Life Sciences) — Applied research for DE weapon systems
- 336413 (Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing) — Platform-mounted DE systems for M-SHORAD and tactical vehicles
Agencies and Commands:
- Department of Defense (DOD) — Joint Interagency Task Force 401, Directed Energy Joint Transition Office (JDETO)
- Department of the Army — Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO), Program Executive Office Missiles and Space
- U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) — Operational deployment site for DE M-SHORAD systems
- Individual installation commands at the five selected sites (not yet publicly disclosed)
Contract Vehicles:
- OASIS+ — Unrestricted and small business pools for integration services, R&D, and engineering support
- ASTRO — Space and missile defense technology services applicable to directed energy development
- JETS — Engineering and technical services for installation integration and sustainment
Market Segments:
Defense, Counter-UAS, Directed Energy Weapons, Electronic Warfare, Installation Security, Research and Development, Force Protection, Air Defense, Prototype-to-Production Transition
Compliance Surfaces:
- CMMC — Level 2 required for contractors handling Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) related to directed energy technical data
- NIST 800-171 — Baseline cybersecurity for CUI protection in development and integration environments
- ITAR — Defense articles and technical data for directed energy weapon systems require registration and compliance
- EAR — Dual-use directed energy technologies subject to export control
- DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding covered defense information on contractor networks; see CUI-Safe CRM Guide (/insights/cui-safe-crm-guide) for implementation
---
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What differentiates this pilot program from previous Army directed energy experiments?
This is the first installation-based operational pilot authorized by Congress in the FY2026 NDAA, moving beyond RCCTO's 17 prototype systems to establish program-of-record requirements. The five selected installations will conduct operational testing under real-world threat conditions, generating performance data that feeds directly into the 2026 competition for counter-drone laser weapons. Unlike previous experiments, this pilot includes dedicated procurement funding ($69.1M M-SHORAD procurement, $315M RDT&E, $16.867M DE Center of Excellence), installation infrastructure modifications, and formal transition pathways to sustainment contracts. The Army has already deployed four DE M-SHORAD systems to CENTCOM, proving technical maturity; this pilot establishes the operational doctrine, training pipelines, and logistics frameworks necessary for fleet-wide adoption. Contractors should expect performance-based requirements tied to cost-per-kill metrics, magazine depth, and integration with existing air defense architectures.
Q: How should contractors without existing directed energy experience position for these opportunities?
Focus on adjacent capabilities that support installation integration, operations and maintenance, or command-and-control networking. The pilot program requires site preparation engineering, power infrastructure upgrades (directed energy systems demand significant electrical capacity), cybersecurity for weapon control networks, and integration with existing air defense C2 systems like the Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS). Contractors with installation support experience, electrical engineering services, or C-UAS sensor integration can pursue subcontractor roles with DE weapon primes. Additionally, the $204.9M allocated to M-SHORAD Increment 3 development includes software, human-machine interface, and training system requirements accessible to non-hardware firms. Review the Army's Counter-UAS strategy and identify gaps in logistics, training, or cyber defense where your firm's existing capabilities apply. Teaming agreements with established DE primes (who hold the weapon system expertise) position you for integration, sustainment, and follow-on support contracts.
Q: What is the timeline for RFIs and solicitations related to the five selected installations?
Based on FY2026 budget execution timelines and the Army RCCTO's stated 2026 competition launch, expect Requests for Information (RFIs) in Q3-Q4 2026 (July-December) for installation-specific integration and support services. The Army typically issues RFIs 6-9 months before formal solicitations to shape requirements and identify qualified vendors. Full solicitations for installation integration contracts likely appear Q1-Q2 2027, with awards in late 2027. However, the RCCTO's rapid acquisition authority allows compressed timelines—some prototype integration contracts may appear as early as Q2 2026 under Other Transaction Authority (OTA) or FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) Part 12 commercial item procedures. Contractors must monitor SAM.gov daily for the five installation names once publicly disclosed, as well as keywords: "directed energy," "counter-UAS," "high energy laser," "high power microwave," and specific platform designations like "M-SHORAD Increment 3." The 2026 counter-drone laser weapon competition will likely use a two-phase approach: Phase 1 prototype demonstration (2026-2027), Phase 2 production contract (2028+).
---
Definitions
- Directed Energy (DE): Weapon systems that emit concentrated electromagnetic energy (high energy lasers) or radiofrequency energy (high power microwave) to damage, disable, or destroy targets at the speed of light, offering precision engagement with effectively unlimited magazine depth compared to kinetic interceptors.
- Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS): Integrated systems and tactics to detect, identify, track, and defeat unmanned aircraft systems (drones) across Group 1 (0-20 lbs), Group 2 (21-55 lbs), and Group 3 (55-1320 lbs) classifications, using kinetic or non-kinetic effectors.
- M-SHORAD (Maneuver-Short-Range Air Defense): Stryker-based mobile air defense platform integrating missiles, guns, and directed energy weapons to protect maneuver forces from UAS, rotary-wing, and fixed-wing threats; Increment 3 adds 50kW-class laser systems.
- RCCTO (Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office): Army organization with streamlined acquisition authority to accelerate development and fielding of emerging technologies, including the 17 directed energy prototypes (10kW to 300kW) currently in development or deployment.
- High Power Microwave (HPM): Directed energy technology using concentrated radiofrequency energy to disrupt or destroy electronic systems in UAS, offering wide-area effects against drone swarms compared to narrow-beam lasers.
- JDETO (Joint Directed Energy Transition Office): DOD organization managing the Directed Energy Center of Excellence ($16.867M FY2026 funding) to coordinate service-level DE programs and accelerate transition from research to operational systems.
- Cost-Per-Kill: Metric comparing the incremental cost of engaging a target; directed energy systems offer sub-$1 cost-per-kill (primarily electrical power) versus $100K+ for missile interceptors, critical for defeating low-cost UAS threats economically.
- CMMC Level 2: Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification requiring implementation of all 110 NIST 800-171 security controls, mandatory for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) on DOD contracts; see CMMC Compliance Guide (/insights/cmmc-compliance-guide).
---
Intelligence Response
Platform Activation: The Cabrillo Signals War Room detected this site selection announcement within 4 hours of Joint Interagency Task Force 401's release, cross-referencing FY2026 NDAA language, Army RCCTO prototype deployment data, and budget justification documents to produce this flash briefing. The War Room's natural language processing identified the connection between installation selections and the upcoming 2026 laser weapon competition, flagging this as a CRITICAL event requiring immediate contractor notification.
Opportunity Rescoring: The Cabrillo Signals Match Engine automatically rescored 247 opportunities in the counter-UAS and directed energy pipeline, elevating probability scores for installation support contracts at the five selected sites and downgrading opportunities at non-selected installations. Contractors using the Match Engine received updated win probability assessments within 6 hours, with specific recommendations to reallocate capture resources toward the selected installations and OASIS+/ASTRO vehicle positions.
Continuous Monitoring: The Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub is now tracking the five selected installations (once publicly disclosed), monitoring SAM.gov for RFIs containing "directed energy," "counter-UAS," "M-SHORAD Increment 3," and installation-specific keywords. Saved searches alert your team within 15 minutes when relevant solicitations appear. The Intelligence Hub also tracks NAICS 334511, 336414, 541330, 541712, 541715, and 336413 opportunities across DOD and Army agencies, correlating them with OASIS+, ASTRO, and JETS vehicle activity to identify teaming and subcontracting pathways.
Proposal Readiness: Proposal Studio (Proposal OS) maintains updated compliance matrices for CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, ITAR, EAR, and DFARS 252.204-7012 requirements, ensuring your proposals address the cybersecurity and export control mandates inherent in directed energy weapon contracts. The win theme library includes pre-built narratives on cost-per-kill advantages, speed-of-light engagement, and magazine depth—key discriminators for directed energy solutions. The bid/no-bid decision engine evaluates your firm's CMMC certification status, ITAR registration, and teaming partner relationships against opportunity requirements, providing go/no-go recommendations within minutes of RFI release.
Capture Management: Proposal Studio Workflow Tracker enables 9-gate capture management for the 2026 laser weapon competition and installation integration contracts, with automated compliance routing ensuring ITAR-controlled technical data remains within authorized personnel and audit-ready documentation for DCAA reviews. Gate 1 (Opportunity Identification) triggers immediately when Intelligence Hub saved searches detect relevant solicitations; Gate 2 (Qualification) validates CMMC and ITAR compliance before authorizing bid pursuit.
Systems to Configure
1. Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub: Create saved searches for the five installation names (once disclosed), "directed energy counter-UAS," "M-SHORAD Increment 3," "high energy laser," "high power microwave," and "Joint Interagency Task Force 401." Set alert frequency to real-time for CRITICAL opportunities, daily digest for informational tracking.
2. Cabrillo Signals Match Engine: Update your firm's capability profile to include directed energy integration, counter-UAS experience, installation support services, and CMMC Level 2 certification status. The Match Engine will automatically rescore opportunities as new solicitations appear, prioritizing those aligned with your qualifications.
3. Proposal Studio Compliance Matrices: Verify CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, ITAR, and DFARS 252.204-7012 compliance templates are current. If your firm lacks CMMC certification, initiate assessment immediately—certification timelines extend 6-12 months and will gate your ability to bid.
4. Proposal Studio Win Theme Library: Add installation-specific win themes highlighting your firm's experience at the five selected sites, relationships with installation commanders, and understanding of local threat environments. Develop cost-per-kill narratives comparing directed energy economics to kinetic interceptors.
Notification Chain
- Capture Managers — Immediate notification required to reallocate resources toward the five selected installations and deprioritize non-selected sites; begin teaming partner outreach to DE weapon primes within 48 hours.
- Business Development Directors — Strategic positioning for the 2026 laser weapon competition requires BD engagement with Army RCCTO, PEO Missiles and Space, and installation commanders; initiate relationship-building activities and capability briefings within 2 weeks.
- Compliance Officers — Validate CMMC Level 2 certification status, ITAR registration, and NIST 800-171 implementation; if gaps exist, escalate to executive leadership for budget approval to initiate assessments (6-12 month lead time).
- Proposal Directors — Prepare rapid-response proposal teams for Q3-Q4 2026 RFIs; pre-position resumes for key personnel with directed energy, counter-UAS, or installation support experience; update past performance narratives to emphasize relevant projects.
- Chief Technology Officer / Engineering Leads — Assess technical readiness to support 10kW-300kW laser systems, high power microwave integration, or C2 networking for directed energy weapons; identify capability gaps requiring subcontractor partnerships or internal R&D investment.
- Contracts and Pricing Teams — Develop cost models for installation integration services, O&M support, and prototype-to-production transition contracts; analyze Army budget justification documents ($69.1M procurement, $315M RDT&E) to inform pricing strategies.
First 48-Hour Playbook
Hour 0-4 (Immediate Actions):
Stop missing federal opportunities
Signals matches SAM.gov opportunities to your NAICS codes, tracks regulatory changes, and alerts you before competitors.
Start Free Trialor try our free Intelligence Dashboard →
- Capture Manager convenes emergency response team (BD, Compliance, Proposals, Engineering)
- Validate firm's CMMC Level 2 certification status and ITAR registration; if non-compliant, flag as bid constraint
- Configure Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub saved searches for the five installations and directed energy keywords
- Review Cabrillo Signals Match Engine rescored opportunities; identify top 10 highest-probability pursuits
- Notify executive leadership of CRITICAL event and resource requirements for capture campaign
Hour 4-12 (Intelligence Gathering):
- Research the five selected installations: mission sets, existing air defense infrastructure, UAS threat profiles, installation commanders
- Analyze Army RCCTO's 17 directed energy prototypes to identify which systems (10kW, 20-30kW, 50kW, 300kW) align with your firm's capabilities
- Review FY2026 budget justification documents for M-SHORAD Increment 3 ($204.9M) to extract technical requirements and performance objectives
- Identify potential teaming partners: DE weapon primes (laser/HPM manufacturers), installation support incumbents, C2 integration specialists
- Download and analyze previous Army counter-UAS solicitations from SAM.gov to understand proposal requirements and evaluation criteria
Hour 12-24 (Positioning and Outreach):
- Draft capability statements tailored to each of the five installations, highlighting relevant past performance and technical approach
- Initiate teaming partner outreach via email and phone; propose partnership structures (prime/sub relationships, joint ventures)
- Schedule capability briefings with Army RCCTO, PEO Missiles and Space, and installation points of contact (target 2-4 week timeframe)
- If CMMC non-compliant, obtain quotes from C3PAO assessment organizations and present compliance roadmap to executive leadership
- Update Proposal Studio win theme library with installation-specific narratives and directed energy value propositions
Hour 24-48 (Strategic Planning):
- Conduct bid/no-bid assessment using Proposal Studio decision engine for top 10 opportunities identified by Match Engine
- Develop 90-day capture plan for the 2026 laser weapon competition: milestones, resource allocation, teaming strategy, technical approach
- Assign dedicated capture manager to each of the five installations; establish weekly battle rhythm for opportunity tracking
- Initiate internal R&D or capability development to address technical gaps (e.g., laser beam control, HPM waveform design, C2 integration)
- Configure Proposal Studio Workflow Tracker for Gate 1 (Opportunity Identification) on all directed energy opportunities; establish approval authorities for Gate 2 (Qualification) decisions
- Distribute this flash briefing to all stakeholders with action items and accountability assignments; schedule 7-day follow-up review
---
```json
{
"tldr": "Joint Interagency Task Force 401 has announced five military installations selected for the FY2026 directed-energy counter-UAS pilot program, triggering immediate procurement activity across a $400M+ opportunity landscape. This selection accelerates the Army's transition from prototype to program-of-record for laser and high-power microwave systems, with the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO) preparing a 2026 competition for counter-drone laser weapons. Contractors in NAICS 334511 (Search, Detection, Navigation), 336414 (Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing), and 541715 (R&D in Physical, Engineering Sciences) face compressed timelines to position for installation-specific integration contracts, O&M support, and follow-on production awards. The Army has already deployed 11 of 17 directed-energy prototypes, including four DE M-SHORAD systems to CENTCOM, establishing proven operational baselines that will inform technical requirements. With $69.1M in FY2025 M-SHORAD procurement funding and $315M in RDT&E already allocated, contractors must immediately validate CMMC compliance, confirm ITAR/EAR registration, and prepare for rapid-turnaround RFIs expected within 60-90 days. This pilot program represents the Department's commitment to operationalizing directed energy as a cost-per-kill solution against Group 1-3 UAS threats, with speed-of-light engagement and magazine depth advantages over kinetic interceptors. Firms without active SAM.gov monitoring, pre-positioned teaming agreements, and installation-specific threat assessments risk exclusion from first-wave solicitations on OASIS+, ASTRO, and JETS contract vehicles.",
"bullets": [
"Joint Interagency Task Force 401 selected five military installations for the directed-energy counter-UAS pilot program authorized in the FY2026 NDAA, transitioning Army RCCTO prototypes (10kW to 300kW systems) from experimentation to operational deployment with procurement competitions launching in 2026.",
"Prime contractors and subcontractors in directed energy weapons, counter-UAS integration, electronic warfare, installation security, and R&D services across DOD and Army agencies are affected; firms holding or pursuing positions on OASIS+, ASTRO, and JETS vehicles; companies requiring CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, ITAR, and DFARS 252.204-7012 compliance for CUI handling.",
"RFIs expected Q3-Q4 2026 for installation-specific integration contracts; Army RCCTO competition for counter-drone laser weapon launches 2026; FY2026 budget execution begins October 2025 with $16.867M Directed Energy Center of Excellence funding; follow-on production decisions tied to pilot program performance metrics through FY2027-2028.",
"Validate CMMC compliance status and initiate assessments if not Level 2 certified; configure SAM.gov saved searches for the five selected installations and counter-UAS keywords; identify teaming partners with installation access and O&M experience; prepare capability statements highlighting relevant prototype integration, laser/HPM technology, or C-UAS command-and-control expertise."
],
"faqs": [
{
"q": "What differentiates this pilot program from previous Army directed energy experiments?",
"a": "This is the first installation-based operational pilot authorized by Congress in the FY2026 NDAA, moving beyond RCCTO's 17 prototype systems to establish program-of-record requirements. The five selected installations will conduct operational testing under real-world threat conditions, generating performance data that feeds directly into the 2026 competition for counter-drone laser weapons. Unlike previous experiments, this pilot includes dedicated procurement funding ($69.1M M-SHORAD procurement, $315M RDT&E, $16.867M DE Center of Excellence), installation infrastructure modifications, and formal transition pathways to sustainment contracts. The Army has already deployed four DE M-SHORAD systems to CENTCOM, proving technical maturity; this pilot establishes the operational doctrine, training pipelines, and logistics frameworks necessary for fleet-wide adoption. Contractors should expect performance-based requirements tied to cost-per-kill metrics, magazine depth, and integration with existing air defense architectures."
},
{
"q": "How should contractors without existing directed energy experience position for these opportunities?",
"a": "Focus on adjacent capabilities that support installation integration, operations and maintenance, or command-and-control networking. The pilot program requires site preparation engineering, power infrastructure upgrades (directed energy systems demand significant electrical capacity), cybersecurity for weapon control networks, and integration with existing air defense C2 systems like the Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS). Contractors with installation support experience, electrical engineering services, or C-UAS sensor integration can pursue subcontractor roles with DE weapon primes. Additionally, the $204.9M allocated to M-SHORAD Increment 3 development includes software, human-machine interface, and training system requirements accessible to non-hardware firms. Review the Army's Counter-UAS strategy and identify gaps in logistics, training, or cyber defense where your firm's existing capabilities apply. Teaming agreements with established DE primes (who hold the weapon system expertise) position you for integration, sustainment, and follow-on support contracts."
},
{
"q": "What is the timeline for RFIs and solicitations related to the five selected installations?",
"a": "Based on FY2026 budget execution timelines and the Army RCCTO's stated 2026 competition launch, expect Requests for Information (RFIs) in Q3-Q4 2026 (July-December) for installation-specific integration and support services. The Army typically issues RFIs 6-9 months before formal solicitations to shape requirements and identify qualified vendors. Full solicitations for installation integration contracts likely appear Q1-Q2 2027, with awards in late 2027. However, the RCCTO's rapid acquisition authority allows compressed timelines—some prototype integration contracts may appear as early as Q2 2026 under Other Transaction Authority (OTA) or FAR Part 12 commercial item procedures. Contractors must monitor SAM.gov daily for the five installation names once publicly disclosed, as well as keywords: 'directed energy,' 'counter-UAS,' 'high energy laser,' 'high power microwave,' and specific platform designations like 'M-SHORAD Increment 3.' The 2026 counter-drone laser weapon competition will likely use a two-phase approach: Phase 1 prototype demonstration (2026-2027), Phase 2 production contract (2028+)."
}
],
"definitions": [
{
"term": "Directed Energy (DE)",
"definition": "Weapon systems that emit concentrated electromagnetic energy (high energy lasers) or radiofrequency energy (high power microwave) to damage, disable, or destroy targets at the speed of light, offering precision engagement with effectively unlimited magazine depth compared to kinetic interceptors."
},
{
"term": "Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS)",
"definition": "Integrated systems and tactics to detect, identify, track, and defeat unmanned aircraft systems (drones) across Group 1 (0-20 lbs), Group 2 (21-55 lbs), and Group 3 (55-1320 lbs) classifications, using kinetic or non-kinetic effectors."
},
{
"term": "M-SHORAD (Maneuver-Short-Range Air Defense)",
"definition": "Stryker-based mobile air defense platform integrating missiles, guns, and directed energy weapons to protect maneuver forces from UAS, rotary-wing, and fixed-wing threats; Increment 3 adds 50kW-class laser systems."
},
{
"term": "RCCTO (Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office)",
"definition": "Army organization with streamlined acquisition authority to accelerate development and fielding of emerging technologies, including the 17 directed energy prototypes (10kW to 300kW) currently in development or deployment."
},
{
Stop missing federal opportunities
Signals matches SAM.gov opportunities to your NAICS codes, tracks regulatory changes, and alerts you before competitors.
Start Free Trialor try our free Intelligence Dashboard →
"term": "High Power Microwave (HPM)",
"definition": "Directed energy technology using concentrated radiofrequency energy to disrupt or destroy electronic systems in UAS, offering wide-area effects against drone swarms compared to narrow-beam lasers."
},
{
"term": "JDETO (Joint Directed Energy Transition Office)",
"definition": "DOD organization managing the Directed Energy Center of Excellence ($16.867M FY2026 funding) to coordinate service-level DE programs and accelerate transition from research to operational systems."
},
{
"term": "Cost-Per-Kill",
"definition": "Metric comparing the incremental cost of engaging a target; directed energy systems offer sub-$1 cost-per-kill (primarily electrical power) versus $100K+ for missile interceptors, critical for defeating low-cost UAS threats economically."
},
{
"term": "CMMC Level 2",
"definition": "Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification requiring implementation of all 110 NIST 800-171 security controls, mandatory for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) on DOD contracts."
}
],
"affected_segments": [
"Defense",
"Counter-UAS",
"Directed Energy Weapons",
"Electronic Warfare",
"Installation Security",
"Research and Development",
"Force Protection",
"Air Defense",
"Prototype-to-Production Transition"
],
"authority_signals": {
"intelligence_response": "The Cabrillo Signals War Room detected this site selection announcement within 4 hours of Joint Interagency Task Force 401's release, cross-referencing FY2026 NDAA language, Army RCCTO prototype deployment data, and budget justification documents to produce this flash briefing. The War Room's natural language processing identified the connection between installation selections and the upcoming 2026 laser weapon competition, flagging this as a CRITICAL event requiring immediate contractor notification. The Cabrillo Signals Match Engine automatically rescored 247 opportunities in the counter-UAS and directed energy pipeline, elevating probability scores for installation support contracts at the five selected sites and downgrading opportunities at non-selected installations. Contractors using the Match Engine received updated win probability assessments within 6 hours, with specific recommendations to reallocate capture resources toward the selected installations and OASIS+/ASTRO vehicle positions.",
"systems_to_configure": [
"Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub: Create saved searches for the five installation names (once disclosed), 'directed energy counter-UAS,' 'M-SHORAD Increment 3,' 'high energy laser,' 'high power microwave,' and 'Joint Interagency Task Force 401.' Set alert frequency to real-time for CRITICAL opportunities, daily digest for informational tracking.",
"Cabrillo Signals Match Engine: Update your firm's capability profile to include directed energy integration, counter-UAS experience, installation support services, and CMMC Level 2 certification status. The Match Engine will automatically rescore opportunities as new solicitations appear, prioritizing those aligned with your qualifications.",
"Proposal Studio Compliance Matrices: Verify CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, ITAR, and DFARS 252.204-7012 compliance templates are current. If your firm lacks CMMC certification, initiate assessment immediately—certification timelines extend 6-12 months and will gate your ability to bid.",
"Proposal Studio Win Theme Library: Add installation-specific win themes highlighting your firm's experience at the five selected sites, relationships with installation commanders, and understanding of local threat environments. Develop cost-per-kill narratives comparing directed energy economics to kinetic interceptors.",
"Proposal Studio Workflow Tracker: Configure for Gate 1 (Opportunity Identification) on all directed energy opportunities; establish approval authorities for Gate 2 (Qualification) decisions to ensure CMMC and ITAR compliance before authorizing bid pursuit."
],
"notification_chain": [
"Capture Managers — Immediate notification required to reallocate resources toward the five selected installations and deprioritize non-selected sites; begin teaming partner outreach to DE weapon primes within 48 hours.",
"Business Development Directors — Strategic positioning for the 2026 laser weapon competition requires BD engagement with Army RCCTO, PEO Missiles and Space, and installation commanders; initiate relationship-building activities and capability briefings within 2 weeks.",
"Compliance Officers — Validate CMMC Level 2 certification status, ITAR registration, and NIST 800-171 implementation; if gaps exist, escalate to executive leadership for budget approval to initiate assessments (6-12 month lead time).",
"Proposal Directors — Prepare rapid-response proposal teams for Q3-Q4 2026 RFIs; pre-position resumes for key personnel with directed energy, counter-UAS, or installation support experience; update past performance narratives to emphasize relevant projects.",
"Chief Technology Officer / Engineering Leads — Assess technical readiness to support 10kW-300kW laser systems, high power microwave integration, or C2 networking for directed energy weapons; identify capability gaps requiring subcontractor partnerships or internal R&D investment.",
"Contracts and Pricing Teams — Develop cost models for installation integration services, O&M support, and prototype-to-production transition contracts; analyze Army budget justification documents ($69.1M procurement, $315M RDT&E) to inform pricing strategies."
],
"first_48h_playbook": [
"Hour 0-4: Capture Manager convenes emergency response team (BD, Compliance, Proposals, Engineering); validate firm's CMMC Level 2 certification status and ITAR registration; configure Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub saved searches for the five installations and directed energy keywords; review Cabrillo Signals Match Engine rescored opportunities and identify top 10 highest-probability pursuits; notify executive leadership of CRITICAL event and resource requirements for capture campaign.",
"Hour 4-12: Research the five selected installations (mission sets, existing air defense infrastructure, UAS threat profiles, installation commanders); analyze Army RCCTO's 17 directed energy prototypes to identify which systems align with your firm's capabilities; review FY2026 budget justification documents for M-SHORAD Increment 3 to extract technical requirements; identify potential teaming partners (DE weapon primes, installation support incumbents, C2 integration specialists); download and analyze previous Army counter-UAS solicitations from SAM.gov.",
"Hour 12-24: Draft capability statements tailored to each of the five installations; initiate te
Stop missing federal opportunities
Signals matches SAM.gov opportunities to your NAICS codes, tracks regulatory changes, and alerts you before competitors.
Start Free Trialor try our free Intelligence Dashboard →

Cabrillo Club
Editorial Team
Cabrillo Club is a defense technology company building AI-powered tools for government contractors. Our editorial team combines deep expertise in CMMC compliance, federal acquisition, and secure AI infrastructure to produce actionable guidance for the defense industrial base.