SASC Wants Navy to Develop New DDG(X) Destroyer in Tandem with Trump Battleship
The Senate Armed Services Committee has signaled its intent to require the Navy to pursue two major surface combatant programs simultaneously: the next-generation DDG(X) destroyer and the new Trump-class battleship (BBG(X)).…
Cabrillo Club
Editorial Team · June 21, 2026 · 6 min read

Also in this intelligence package
Action Kit: SASC Wants Navy to Develop New DDG(X) Destroyer in Tandem with Trump Battleship
Overview
The Senate Armed Services Committee has signaled its intent to require the Navy to pursue two major surface combatant programs simultaneously: the next-generation DDG(X) destroyer and the new Trump-class battleship (BBG(X)). According to explanatory report language accompanying the panel's draft Fiscal Year 2027 defense policy bill, SASC believes the Navy must continue DDG(X) development as planned to replace Arleigh Burke-class Flight III destroyers. The committee's rationale centers on the need for a platform to succeed the Flight I Arleigh Burke destroyers when they begin retiring in the 2030s. This dual-track approach represents a significant expansion of the Navy's surface combatant portfolio and will create substantial opportunities across shipbuilding, systems integration, combat systems, sensors, propulsion, and sustainment. Contractors in the naval shipbuilding industrial base should prepare for a multi-decade procurement horizon spanning both programs. The committee's position—if enacted—will shape Navy shipbuilding budgets, R&D priorities, and industrial capacity planning for the next fifteen years. Immediate action is required to position your firm for capture opportunities as program offices stand up and early-phase contracts are awarded.
Immediate Actions (This Week)
- [ ] Review your firm's current Navy surface combatant portfolio and identify gaps in capabilities required for next-generation destroyer platforms (advanced propulsion, integrated power systems, directed energy weapons, advanced radar/sensor suites)
- [ ] Assign a capture lead to monitor the Senate Armed Services Committee markup process and track whether DDG(X) continuation language survives conference with the House version of the FY2027 NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act)
- [ ] Conduct internal assessment of your team's experience with Arleigh Burke-class programs and identify personnel who can credibly claim legacy destroyer platform knowledge in future proposals
- [ ] Reach out to your Navy Program Executive Office (PEO) Ships and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) contacts to gather intelligence on anticipated DDG(X) program timelines and early industry engagement opportunities
- [ ] Begin monitoring SAM.gov (System for Award Management) and beta.SAM.gov for pre-solicitation notices, requests for information (RFIs), and sources sought notices related to DDG(X) or next-generation surface combatant programs
- [ ] If you are a prime shipbuilder or Tier 1 integrator, initiate teaming discussions with subsystem suppliers who have demonstrated performance on Flight III Burke or Zumwalt-class programs
Short-Term Actions (30 Days)
- [ ] Develop a preliminary capture strategy document that addresses both DDG(X) and BBG(X) programs, identifying where your firm has differentiated capabilities and where teaming partnerships will be essential
- [ ] Update your past performance database and capability statements to highlight relevant destroyer-class work, emphasizing modularity, open architecture, scalability, and lifecycle cost reduction—themes likely to dominate DDG(X) requirements
- [ ] Engage with industry associations (National Defense Industrial Association, Surface Navy Association) to participate in DDG(X)-focused panels and gather competitive intelligence on other firms' positioning
- [ ] Conduct a financial analysis to determine your firm's capacity to invest in DDG(X) capture activities, prototype development, or independent R&D aligned with anticipated Navy requirements
- [ ] If you are a small business, identify which DDG(X) subsystems or services are most likely to be set aside and begin relationship-building with primes who will need small business teaming partners to meet socioeconomic goals
Long-Term Actions (90+ Days)
- [ ] Build or refresh technical white papers on your firm's approach to key DDG(X) challenges: integrated power and energy systems, scalable combat system architectures, reduced manning through automation, and open standards for rapid technology insertion
- [ ] Establish a dedicated DDG(X) business development cell with cross-functional representation from engineering, contracts, past performance, and pricing to maintain continuous opportunity tracking through the 2030s retirement timeline mentioned by SASC
- [ ] Develop a multi-year investment roadmap for internal R&D, facility upgrades, workforce training, and strategic hiring to ensure your firm can credibly compete when DDG(X) transitions from concept refinement to engineering and manufacturing development
- [ ] Monitor Navy budget submissions and congressional markup cycles annually to track funding levels for DDG(X) versus BBG(X), as resource competition between the two programs may create opportunities for cost-effective solutions or risk-reduction contracts
- [ ] Prepare for potential foreign military sales (FMS) opportunities if DDG(X) is designed with exportability in mind, and begin relationship-building with allied navies that may seek similar next-generation surface combatant capabilities
Compliance Checklist
Compliance scope TBD — re-evaluate when official DDG(X) program guidance, solicitation language, and contract vehicle selection are published. At a minimum, contractors should anticipate:
- [ ] Standard Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement)) clauses applicable to major defense acquisition programs
- [ ] Cybersecurity and supply chain risk management requirements consistent with Navy shipbuilding programs (specific frameworks TBD pending program office guidance)
- [ ] Cost accounting standards and earned value management system (EVMS) requirements for contractors performing development or production work above applicable thresholds
- [ ] Export control compliance (ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations)) for any foreign teaming partners or FMS-related activities
- [ ] Small business subcontracting plan requirements for prime contractors, with goals aligned with Navy and DoD (Department of Defense) policy
As DDG(X) program documentation becomes available, revisit this checklist and map specific compliance regimes (e.g., NIST SP 800-171 (NIST Special Publication 800-171), CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification), FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) for cloud-based systems) to contract line items and deliverables.
Resources
- Senate Armed Services Committee: Monitor the committee's website for the full explanatory report accompanying the FY2027 NDAA markup when publicly released
- Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA): Track PEO Ships announcements and industry day notices at https://www.navsea.navy.mil (https://www.navsea.navy.mil)
- SAM.gov: Set up saved searches for "DDG(X)", "next-generation destroyer", "surface combatant", and related terms to capture early RFIs and sources sought notices
- Winning Federal Contracts Guide (/insights/winning-federal-contracts) — Comprehensive strategies for positioning your firm in major defense acquisition programs
How Cabrillo Club Automates This
Cabrillo Signals War Room has already detected this Senate Armed Services Committee development and delivered this Action Kit within minutes of the news breaking. The War Room continuously monitors congressional markup language, Navy budget justification documents, and PEO Ships announcements so you never miss a DDG(X) or BBG(X) development. As the FY2027 NDAA moves through conference and the Navy releases program guidance, War Room will automatically surface those updates and contextualize them against your firm's opportunity pipeline.
Stop missing federal opportunities
Signals matches SAM.gov opportunities to your NAICS codes, tracks regulatory changes, and alerts you before competitors.
Start Free Trialor try our free Intelligence Dashboard →
Cabrillo Signals Match Engine is now rescoring every Navy surface combatant opportunity in your pipeline based on this dual-program signal. If you've been tracking Arleigh Burke modernization contracts or Zumwalt follow-on work, Match Engine has automatically elevated their strategic relevance scores because they now serve as pathways into DDG(X). The engine updates keyword relevance (e.g., "integrated power systems," "Flight III," "open architecture") and agency alignment in real time, ensuring your BD team focuses on the opportunities most likely to position you for DDG(X) capture.
Cabrillo Signals Intelligence Hub is tracking NAVSEA, PEO Ships, and the Office of Naval Research for DDG(X)-related activity. Use the saved search feature to configure alerts for solicitations matching "next-generation destroyer," "DDG(X)," or specific NAICS codes associated with shipbuilding and combat systems integration (codes TBD pending official solicitation language). Intelligence Hub will notify you the moment an RFI, sources sought, or pre-solicitation notice appears on SAM.gov, giving you first-mover advantage in shaping requirements and building teaming relationships.
Proposal Studio (Proposal OS) will accelerate your response when DDG(X) solicitations drop. The AI-powered platform generates compliance matrices by parsing Section L and Section M instructions, maintains your win theme library (e.g., "proven Flight III performance," "open architecture reduces lifecycle cost"), and produces first-draft technical approaches using your past performance on Burke-class or other surface combatant programs. When you need to articulate how your firm's integrated power system work on Flight III translates to DDG(X) requirements, Proposal OS pulls relevant past performance narratives and auto-populates them into proposal sections—cutting weeks off your response timeline.
Proposal Studio Workflow Tracker manages the entire capture lifecycle for DDG(X) opportunities, from initial intelligence gathering through post-submission debriefs. The 9-gate process automatically routes compliance reviews to your contracts and legal teams, tracks supplier certifications (critical for shipbuilding supply chains), and generates audit-ready documentation packages for cost proposals and EVMS reporting. As DDG(X) transitions from early R&D to EMD and production, Workflow Tracker ensures nothing falls through the cracks across a multi-year, multi-phase capture campaign.
Explore these features now: Log into your Cabrillo Club dashboard, navigate to the DDG(X) event card in War Room, and click "Create Saved Search" to begin tracking related opportunities. Your Match Engine scores have already updated—review the reshuffled pipeline and prioritize your BD outreach accordingly.
---
Stop missing federal opportunities
Signals matches SAM.gov opportunities to your NAICS codes, tracks regulatory changes, and alerts you before competitors.
Start Free Trialor try our free Intelligence Dashboard →

Cabrillo Club
Editorial Team
Cabrillo Club is a defense technology company building AI-powered tools for government contractors. Our editorial team combines deep expertise in CMMC compliance, federal acquisition, and secure AI infrastructure to produce actionable guidance for the defense industrial base.